eudaimonics

Encapsulates growing our people, our community, our society, our future. 

Measures of human, environmental and future good; maximised at No Moss the way that a for-profit maximises their economics. 

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs

No Moss will share its ever-improving example for other organisations to share, feedback and mutually improve.

  1. Positive REV weighted by client engagement size and duration

  2. Negative REV, weighted as above

  3. No Moss environment:

    • Psychological safety of org.

    • informed consent to decisions that affect the group

    • goodwill/collaboration/loving kindness of leaders & peers

  4. Our people’s growth in their ikigai  

“REV: relative external value a team-set fibonacci number per client engagement factoring human, social, environmental, intellectual, & future net impact of our involvement”
— Steven Ma, Chief Purpose Officer, No Moss

the shadow of eudaimonics

The cult of measurement if not an absolute good for organisations and people. Our eudaimonics is still just a hypothesis - we are not sure if this gives us the guidance we will need.

Some considerations:

  • what kind of metric, how useful is it; how useful are ‘more’ if some already exist?

  • what are the costs of not having them; what is the cost to acquire them?

  • how will the measures be used in our org? How might they be corrupted or subject to goal diversion?